In Dear Nathalie, silence is not empty. It is active,
deliberate, and consequential. Told through letters, omissions, and fragmented
reflection, the literary novella examines how what is never said can shape
lives as powerfully as what is spoken aloud. The story unfolds not through
confrontation, but through delay—through conversations avoided, definitions
postponed, and truths left unnamed.
From the beginning, the relationship at the heart of Dear
Nathalie is defined by restraint. Words flow freely, yet the central
question—what this connection truly is—remains untouched. The characters speak
around the truth rather than into it. This silence is not accidental. It is
protective. And over time, it becomes destructive.
The book’s epistolary structure sharpens this tension.
Letters allow intimacy without immediacy. They permit reflection without
consequence. Through writing, emotions can be expressed while decisions are
deferred. The novella exposes how silence can hide inside communication itself,
disguised as thoughtfulness or care.
Nathalie senses this silence long before it becomes final.
Her letters carry urgency beneath restraint, belief beneath patience. She waits
for clarity that never arrives, interpreting hesitation through spiritual
meaning rather than human choice. Silence becomes something she absorbs rather
than confronts.
The surviving voice, by contrast, treats silence as
stability. Not naming the relationship feels safer than risking disruption. The
book does not frame this as cruelty, but as fear. Yet Dear Nathalie
insists that fear-driven silence still carries consequence. Avoidance does not
neutralize impact—it delays it.
When Nathalie disappears, silence shifts from emotional
strategy to permanent condition. The novella makes a devastating choice here:
it does not change tone. The absence feels familiar because silence has been
present all along. What was once chosen becomes inescapable.
After Nathalie’s death is revealed, silence takes on new
weight. Words written afterward echo into nothing. Letters arrive without
reader. Meaning collapses inward. The book suggests that silence after death is
not peaceful—it is accusatory. It holds every moment where speech could have
changed trajectory.
Dear Nathalie also explores how silence affects those
on the margins. Suzanne lives inside a marriage shaped by what is never
articulated. She senses emotional displacement without language to challenge
it. Her anger, when it surfaces, is treated not as hysteria, but as recognition
finally breaking through silence.
The novella refuses the comforting belief that silence
preserves harmony. Instead, it reveals how silence redistributes harm. Those
who speak less suffer more. Those who delay confrontation survive longer. The
imbalance remains uncorrected.
Stylistically, the book mirrors its theme. Gaps in time,
unfinished exchanges, and withheld explanations force the reader to sit with
uncertainty. Meaning is not clarified—it accumulates. Silence becomes a
narrative force rather than a void.
Dear Nathalie positions itself as a work of literary
fiction deeply concerned with absence. It asks readers to consider not only
what characters do, but what they refuse to say. In doing so, it challenges the
assumption that restraint is virtuous and quietness harmless.
This is a story that insists on a difficult truth:
silence is a choice, until it isn’t. And once it becomes permanent, there is no
language powerful enough to undo it.
Contact:
Amazon: DEAR NATHALIE
Author: Tanya kazanjian
Email: tanya_kazanjian@yahoo.com / tkaz1953@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment